IMPORTANT: Applications will be assessed on a scale from 0 to 100 and will be ranked accordingly to their merit. The threshold is set at 75/100 points.
|1.||Relevance of the project||This criterion evaluates the relevance of the content of the project vis-à-vis the objectives of the call for proposals and the needs of the cultural sector and target groups (the format, the feasibility and consistency of the project in relation to the objectives) in the area of implementation. This criterion both evaluates, how clearly and strategically those involved (final beneficiaries, partners, target groups) are chosen and how their needs have been defined and addressed, and how at long term the project might have an overall impact in the region in terms of sustainable cultural and/or social development.||30|
|2.||Communication strategy / dissemination capacities||This criterion evaluates the dissemination and communication strategy of the project and its adequacy to address different target groups and audiences, building synergies, networks and collaborations with other projects and operators.||20|
|3.||Quality of the financial offer||This criterion evaluates the project budget and the ratio between the estimated costs and the real costs. Applications presenting a clear funding strategy with detailed evidence of potential or confirmed complementary funding sources will be positively assessed.||20|
|4.||Potential of the project team||This criterion assesses the potential of the project by evaluating the quality and the structure of the project team and its partnership.||15|
|5.||Previous experience||This criterion evaluates the expertise of the applicant and the partners in the field(s) related to the project in order to ensure the good quality of the outputs.||15|
Links and attachments